[Insight-developers] Latest WrapITK merged in ITK
Gaëtan Lehmann
gaetan.lehmann at jouy.inra.fr
Thu Jan 27 04:01:29 EST 2011
Hans,
That sounds like a good option.
I'm not yet used to using the external projects!
Gaëtan
Le 26 janv. 11 à 22:26, Johnson, Hans J a écrit :
> We could make a CMakeExternal package that builds swig as part of
> ITK if
> necessary. Swig is actually very small, and compared to the size, and
> compile time of wrapped ITK it is going to be negligible.
>
> Hans
>
>
> On 1/26/11 1:52 PM, "Gaëtan Lehmann" <gaetan.lehmann at jouy.inra.fr>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Le 26 janv. 11 à 15:13, Bradley Lowekamp a écrit :
>>
>>> Gaetan,
>>>
>>
>> Hi Brad,
>>
>>> Over night on my mac laptop I was able to build Wrap ITK with swig
>>> 1.3.31, OK. It was submitted as an experiential under malawi.local.
>>> There is only one failing test due to a time out, but a whole bunch
>>> of warning. I am going to configure a new nightly build on a mac
>>> with this system default version of swig. I feel that this version
>>> of swig needs to be supported given in comes with the macs, unless
>>> there is a very compelling benefit to requiring a newer version.
>>
>> There is a problem with swig 1.3.31 and python 2.5 which leads to
>> this
>> warning.
>> Unfortunately that's the versions apple have chosen to distribute
>> not sure what we can do about that.
>> The bug has been fixed in swig 1.3.33
>>
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1798551&group_id=
>> 1645&atid=101645
>>
>> Gaëtan
>>
>>>
>>> The build with swig 1.3.29 did not submit as expected.
>>>
>>> Brad
>>>
>>> On Jan 25, 2011, at 4:41 PM, Gaëtan Lehmann wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le 25 janv. 11 à 22:31, Bradley Lowekamp a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 25, 2011, at 3:16 PM, Gaëtan Lehmann wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Brad,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry, I'm not sure how but I managed to miss your mail.
>>>>>
>>>>> No worries.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We are recommending the version 1.3.38 or newer, but haven't
>>>>>> forced a minimum version as the required version depends on many
>>>>>> things ‹ for example, the python version used, the integration of
>>>>>> the doxygen documentation in the python one, etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hrmm.. This explains why I have not been able to build WrapITK
>>>>> today. Well I have 1.3.31 which is the version on my mac, and on
>>>>> the cluster, I get 1.3.29. Looking for release date of these I
>>>>> find
>>>>>
>>>>> 1.3.38 1/31/2009
>>>>> 1.3.31 11/20/2006
>>>>> 1.3.29 3/21/2006
>>>>>
>>>>> I am lazy, how needed are the newer feature of swig? I don't like
>>>>> to have to build, and keep around more non-system tools then
>>>>> really needed. Too easy to get too many different versions of
>>>>> things laying around. Any ways it could be more compatible with
>>>>> older versions of swig?
>>>>
>>>> We can probably restrict the flag used to fit the swig version, but
>>>> there might still be some bugs in older swig versions.
>>>>
>>>> Can you submit an experimental build, so I can try to figure out
>>>> what needs to be done?
>>>>
>>>> Gaëtan
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Brad
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At some point, we may have to force a minimum version though, to
>>>>>> make the debugging possible from the report of our users.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> About the performance, swig provides a -O options which makes the
>>>>>> generated code a lot faster. From the swig doc and for python:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -O - Enable the following optimization options:
>>>>>> -modern -fastdispatch -nosafecstrings -
>>>>>> fvirtual -noproxydel
>>>>>> -fastproxy -fastinit -fastunpack -
>>>>>> fastquery -modernargs -nobuildnone
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not sure which version adds those optimizations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gaëtan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le 23 janv. 11 à 14:59, Bradley Lowekamp a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gaetan,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You said that you got a lot of performance gain from a newer
>>>>>>> version of SWIG. I don't see which version number you recommend.
>>>>>>> I have SWIG 1.3.31 that came with my mac. Which version do you
>>>>>>> recommend?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Brad
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jan 23, 2011, at 5:24 AM, Gaëtan Lehmann wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dear developers,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've juste merged the WrapITK branch from
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ComplexSystemsModeling/ITK/tree/wrapitk
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> in the ITK main repository. I would have prefer to merge the
>>>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>> without changes, to be able to continue the development in the
>>>>>>>> same
>>>>>>>> place, but unfortunately I had to rebase the branch to add the
>>>>>>>> required prefix in the commit name. When we began to work on
>>>>>>>> WrapITK
>>>>>>>> branch, this was not enforced by a hook.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The CSwig wrapper has been removed. The most important changes
>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>> listed at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://code.google.com/p/wrapitk/wiki/Release030
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A few other thing are not listed there - mostly improved
>>>>>>>> wrapping
>>>>>>>> coverage and an explicit instantiation prototype.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So far everything seems to be OK on the dashboard.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please let me know any problem you may find.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gaëtan
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Gaëtan Lehmann
>>>>>>>> Biologie du Développement et de la Reproduction
>>>>>>>> INRA de Jouy-en-Josas (France)
>>>>>>>> tel: +33 1 34 65 29 66 fax: 01 34 65 29 09
>>>>>>>> http://voxel.jouy.inra.fr http://www.itk.org
>>>>>>>> http://www.mandriva.org http://www.bepo.fr
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <PGP.sig><ATT00001..txt>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Gaëtan Lehmann
>>>>>> Biologie du Développement et de la Reproduction
>>>>>> INRA de Jouy-en-Josas (France)
>>>>>> tel: +33 1 34 65 29 66 fax: 01 34 65 29 09
>>>>>> http://voxel.jouy.inra.fr http://www.itk.org
>>>>>> http://www.mandriva.org http://www.bepo.fr
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ========================================================
>>>>> Bradley Lowekamp
>>>>> Lockheed Martin Contractor for
>>>>> Office of High Performance Computing and Communications
>>>>> National Library of Medicine
>>>>> blowekamp at mail.nih.gov
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Gaëtan Lehmann
>>>> Biologie du Développement et de la Reproduction
>>>> INRA de Jouy-en-Josas (France)
>>>> tel: +33 1 34 65 29 66 fax: 01 34 65 29 09
>>>> http://voxel.jouy.inra.fr http://www.itk.org
>>>> http://www.mandriva.org http://www.bepo.fr
>>>>
>>>
>>> ========================================================
>>> Bradley Lowekamp
>>> Lockheed Martin Contractor for
>>> Office of High Performance Computing and Communications
>>> National Library of Medicine
>>> blowekamp at mail.nih.gov
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Gaëtan Lehmann
>> Biologie du Développement et de la Reproduction
>> INRA de Jouy-en-Josas (France)
>> tel: +33 1 34 65 29 66 fax: 01 34 65 29 09
>> http://voxel.jouy.inra.fr http://www.itk.org
>> http://www.mandriva.org http://www.bepo.fr
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Powered by www.kitware.com
>>
>> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>>
>> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
>> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
>>
>> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
>> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
>>
>> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is
> covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
> 2510-2521, is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you
> are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
> retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
> communication is strictly prohibited. Please reply to the sender
> that you have received the message in error, then delete it. Thank
> you.
> ________________________________
--
Gaëtan Lehmann
Biologie du Développement et de la Reproduction
INRA de Jouy-en-Josas (France)
tel: +33 1 34 65 29 66 fax: 01 34 65 29 09
http://voxel.jouy.inra.fr http://www.itk.org
http://www.mandriva.org http://www.bepo.fr
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une signature ?lectronique PGP
URL: <http://www.itk.org/mailman/private/insight-developers/attachments/20110127/1ac5fe5c/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Insight-developers
mailing list