[Insight-developers] Data submodule was reverted again ( staging check needed? )

[Bradley Lowekamp]

On Jan 26, 2011, at 8:29 AM, Brad King wrote:
> 
> 
> Bill Lorensen wrote:
>> But the current setup with data as a submodule adds complexity to
>> checkins and is subject to unexpected abuse as recently reported by
>> Brad L.
> 
> I can address this with a commit check that ensures no ITK commit's
> Testing/Data submodule references an older version than one of its
> parents.

Excellent!

Are you going to add this as a local commit hook and/or the staging area?

> 
>> The midas solution adds even more complexity, especially for baselines.
>> 
>> I'm looking forward to a solution that keeps the footprint low but
>> keeps the workload on a developer at or near what it was in ITK 3.
> 
> That's a design goal.
> 
> -Brad K
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
> 
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
> http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> 
> Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit:
> http://kitware.com/products/protraining.html
> 
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at:
> http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ
> 
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers

========================================================
Bradley Lowekamp  
Lockheed Martin Contractor for
Office of High Performance Computing and Communications
National Library of Medicine 
blowekamp at mail.nih.gov


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.itk.org/mailman/private/insight-developers/attachments/20110126/2ab3dda2/attachment.htm>