[Insight-developers] Dashboard Looking Good : MultiResImageRegistrationTest (addtional baseline)

[Luis Ibanez]

Hi Bill,


Yes, we seem to need a second baseline for


       MultiResImageRegistration2Test2


The test is failing due to comparisons with the baseline:
http://www.cdash.org/CDash/testSummary.php?project=2&name=MultiResImageRegistration2Test2&date=20080413


  in the following systems

dash19.kitware	Win32-bcc32		Failed	48.52	
SINTEF.LabPC.XP	ITKcvs_CMake247_VS2003	Failed	68.14	
dashsun1.kitware	SunOS-CC-5.6	Failed	121.00	
james.uiowa	Linux-g++4-4.1-opt	Failed	34.51	
dash13.kitware	Win32-vs60		Failed	33.50	
Proximal	Win32-bcc5.5-Static	Not Run	0.00



Proximal is failing to build ITK due to the following error
..\..\..\..\Sources\Insight\Utilities\openjpeg\j2k_lib.c(30) :
fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'sys/time.h':
No such file or directory

So, that's a separate issue.



The numerical convergences of the test are pretty good though:

    dash19.kitware      X = 12.9823 Y = 16.9992
    SINTEF.LabPC.X      X = 12.982  Y = 16.9989
    dashsun1.kitware    X = 12.9819 Y = 16.9985
    james.uiowa         X = 12.982  Y = 16.9995
    dash13.kitware      X = 12.9845 Y = 17

The ideal values are   X = 13.0000 Y = 17.0000



The difference images of the first four systems
look quite close, while the one from dash13 (VS60)
looks different. I think part of the problem is
that we are resampling with the linear interpolator
and once we pass from 16.999 to 17.0001 that results
in a change of 1 pixel position when resampling.

I just added a second baseline (actually third, since
there was already a second baseline ...1.png) by using
the result of dash19.kitware and we may have to add a
third (fourth) for dash14.kitware (VS60) later...


    Luis


-----------------------
Bill Lorensen wrote:
> Luis,
> 
> The changes you made to the multi res registration examples are
> producing great results. Looks like we need a second regression image
> for the second multi res registration example.
> 
> The tests DeformableRegistration15Test1 and
> DeformableRegistration15Test2 are failing on all platforms they run
> on. Looks like they use the data from BrainWeb (Test1) or Kilian
> (Test2).
> 
> It's not clear to me what BrainWeb data is required to run the tests.
> And I don't think Kilian's data should be in a test checked into ITK
> unless we can add his data to the ITK distribution.
> 
> Bill
>