[Insight-developers] Dashboard status & CMake version
Bill Lorensen
wlorens1 at nycap.rr.com
Mon Jan 24 17:22:31 EST 2005
Bill,
I notice that I can't specify the CMAKE_CONFIGURATION_TYPES for VS6. I used
to build RelWithDebInfo. What is the rationale for this change?
Bill
At 09:00 AM 1/24/2005, William A. Hoffman wrote:
>Moving to 2.0 would not be a bad idea. It is the default download for cmake,
>and has been out for about 8 months now, and it makes quite a few things
>easier
>to do. The move from 1.8 to 2.0 should be easier than 1.6 to 1.8 was.
>
>-Bill
>
>
>At 01:40 PM 1/23/2005, Bill Lorensen wrote:
> >In the meantime, I'll build cmake 2.0 on all of my unix/linux platforms
> and see what the impact will be.
> >
> >Bill
> >
> >At 12:26 PM 1/23/2005, Luis Ibanez wrote:
> >>Bill,
> >>
> >>Well, maybe we could explore other options for getting around
> >>this issue.
> >>
> >>Here is the relevant code:
> >>
> >>
> >>Insight/Utilities/gdcm/src/gdcmCommon.h, lines 62-67
> >>
> >>> #if defined(ITK_SIZEOF_LONG_LONG)
> >>> typedef unsigned long long uint64_t;
> >>> #endif
> >>> #if defined( ITK_SIZEOF___INT64 ) && !defined( ITK_SIZEOF_LONG_LONG )
> >>> typedef unsigned __int64 uint64_t;
> >>> #endif
> >>
> >>
> >>and
> >>
> >>Insight/Utilities/gdcm/src/gdcmUtil.h, lines 666-696
> >>
> >>>#if defined( ITK_SIZEOF___INT64 ) || defined( ITK_SIZEOF_LONG_LONG )
> >>> unsigned char addr[6];
> >>> uint64_t n = 0;
> >>> int stat = GetMacAddrSys(addr);
> >>> if (stat == 0)
> >>> {
> >>> // Horner evaluation
> >>> for(int i=0; i<6; i++)
> >>> {
> >>> n *= 256;
> >>> n += addr[i];
> >>> }
> >>> // we fit on 15 bytes maximum < 256^6.
> >>>#if defined(_MSC_VER) || defined(__BORLANDC__)
> >>> return Format("%I64u", n);
> >>>#else
> >>> return Format("%llu", n);
> >>>#endif
> >>> }
> >>> else
> >>> {
> >>> dbg.Verbose(0, "Problem in finding the MAC Address");
> >>> return "";
> >>> }
> >>>#else
> >>> dbg.Verbose(0, "Problem in finding the MAC Address. This platform
> doesn't support 64bit integers.");
> >>> return "";
> >>>#endif
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>We could find an alternative way of constructing the
> >>equivalent of an int 64 for the MAC address and its
> >>formatting as a string for the UID.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Luis
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>------------------------------------------
> >>Bill Lorensen wrote:
> >>
> >>>Luis,
> >>>I thought we would only update Cmake when absolutely necessary. Maybe
> now is the time.
> >>>I have several nightlies that still use cmake 1.8. These are all linux
> or unix build I believe. I can update these to cmake 2.0. In the past,
> cmake upgrades on my GE linux and unix systems have wreaked havoc with a
> number of GE users, since they use my "production" cmake. The errors they
> encounter are usually due to holes that have been plugged in a cmake upgrade.
> >>>If you think it is absolutely necessary, then I'll try to update to
> cmake2.0. Another problem is that I will be out of town for most of this week.
> >>>Bill
> >>>At 11:58 AM 1/23/2005, Luis Ibanez wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Bill,
> >>>>
> >>>>Yeap, that seems to be the case.
> >>>>
> >>>>The complete story is that Mathieu is using a type "uint64" in
> >>>>the encoding of the DICOM UIDs. This type is only available when
> >>>>the compiler provides "long long" (which is a non-standard
> >>>>extension), or actual 64bytes ints.
> >>>>
> >>>>In VTK a test is in place in order to let CMake find whether the
> >>>>platform supports such types or not. I copied the tests from VTK
> >>>>and set it up in ITK in order to conditionally compile that section
> >>>>of code only when"long long" or true 64bytes ints are available.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>However, the test requires some functionality available in
> >>>>CMake post 1.8.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>Which raises up the question:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> What version of CMake are we requiring for ITK 1.10 ?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>I thought we were always requiring an ITK release to be
> >>>>used with the latest release of CMake. (in this case 2.0.5).
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>Are we following that guideline for this release ?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>(Maybe I'm missing a better way of dealing with the int64 type...)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Luis
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>----------------------
> >>>>Bill Lorensen wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>Luis,
> >>>>>Looks like there should be a:
> >>>>>INCLUDE (${CMAKE_ROOT}/Modules/CheckTypeSize.cmake)
> >>>>>but I think this may cause us to require a cmake after 1.8. I'm not
> sure.
> >>>>>Bill
> >>>>>At 09:01 AM 1/23/2005, Luis Ibanez wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Bill,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>I'll look into the config problems on Terminus (Windows)
> >>>>>>it seems that it has been running a CMake 1.9, that doesn't
> >>>>>>support the recent check we added for int64. I'll update
> >>>>>>CMake in that machine.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Luis
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>-----------------------
> >>>>>>Bill Lorensen wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Luis,
> >>>>>>>I fixed gdcm problems on solaris.
> >>>>>>>I fixed itkGDCMImageIO problem.
> >>>>>>>Looks like config problems on Windows platforms. I'll have to
> leave that one to you.
> >>>>>>>Bill
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>Insight-developers mailing list
> >>>>>>>Insight-developers at itk.org
> >>>>>>>http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>>>Insight-developers mailing list
> >>>>>>Insight-developers at itk.org
> >>>>>>http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>>Insight-developers mailing list
> >>>>>Insight-developers at itk.org
> >>>>>http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>Insight-developers mailing list
> >>>>Insight-developers at itk.org
> >>>>http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
> >>>
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>Insight-developers mailing list
> >>>Insight-developers at itk.org
> >>>http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Insight-developers mailing list
> >>Insight-developers at itk.org
> >>http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Insight-developers mailing list
> >Insight-developers at itk.org
> >http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
>
>_______________________________________________
>Insight-developers mailing list
>Insight-developers at itk.org
>http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
More information about the Insight-developers
mailing list