GNTAS Bug Tracking

[Bill Lorensen]

I agree with Vikram. Broad for now. In addition to his suggestions we should cover the linear algebra stuff as well. Depends on the package we pick.

Also,
Documentation
BuildProcess
Validation
Testing

Bill

At 05:22 PM 3/3/00 -0800, Vikram Chalana wrote:
>Ken,
>Since we use gnats for multiple projects, category refers to the project
>name.
>The cool thing about categories is that each category has a person who is
>responsible for that category and a list of people who are notified when a
>bug is added that category.
>
>In our Insight project, we could have very broad categories such as:
>         base-classes
>         segmentation-classes
>         registration-classes
>
>or, we could have a category for each subcontractor,  e.g.,
>         kitware, ge, upenn, etc.
>
>I propose we go with something very broad for now. It is very easy to add
>new
>categories later.
>
>Vikram
>______________________________________________
>Vikram Chalana, Ph.D.        Senior Research Scientist, MathSoft,Inc.
>1700 Westlake Ave. N            206.283.8802 x 314
>Seattle, WA 98109                 Fax: 206.283.8802
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-insight-developers at public.kitware.com
>[mailto:owner-insight-developers at public.kitware.com]On Behalf Of Ken
>Martin
>Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2000 2:03 PM
>To: insight-developers at public.kitware.com
>Subject: GNTAS Bug Tracking
>
>
>I have started setting up the GNATS bug tracker for Insight. One of the
>open issues is the what categories to setup. In GNATS every bug is assigned
>to a category. Could folks who have used GNATS (Vikram)
>or other tools suggest an arrangement of categories. Once we have the
>categories determined I'll finish the setup and post the addresses.
>
>- Thanks
>- Ken