[IGSTK-Users] igstkObserverObjectMacro and igstkObserverMacro

[Torleif Sandnes]

Hi.

I have a short question on the rationale behind the naming of the  
macros igstObserverObjectMacro and igstkObserverMacro:
Why is igstkObserverObjectMacro the macro that defines an observer  
with a *pointer* to a payload, while igstkObserverMacro defines an  
observer with an actual object as payload? This seems counter- 
inituitive to me.

IMHO, a name like igstkObserverPointerObjectMacro for the macro that  
defines an observer that has a pointer to an object, and   
igstkObserverObjectMacro for the macro that defines an observer with  
an actual object would be better.

Regards,

Torleif Sandnes
Sintef Health Research Norway