I sure would like it a whole lot if this happened. <br><br>All kinds of open source tools do a half-ass job of parsing C++. <br><br>And I would love to be able to create static checkers for <br>idiosyncratic situations in our code.
<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/10/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Ken Duck</b> <<a href="mailto:gccxml@twoducks.ca">gccxml@twoducks.ca</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hello.<br><br>I work for a company that is interested in discussing sponsoring<br>development on GCC-XML, possibly including (but not limited to) the<br>following:<br><br> * Implementing function bodies<br> * Fully implementing templates
<br> * Converting the output to follow the KDM specifications<br> (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Discovery_Metamodel">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_Discovery_Metamodel</a>)<br> either directly or through an additional stage.
<br> * Full C support (?)<br><br>We would like to discuss the expense and time scale for such an<br>undertaking.<br><br>Thanks.<br><br>Ken Duck<br>_______________________________________________<br>gccxml mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:gccxml@gccxml.org">gccxml@gccxml.org</a><br><a href="http://www.gccxml.org/mailman/listinfo/gccxml">http://www.gccxml.org/mailman/listinfo/gccxml</a><br><br></blockquote></div><br>