[CMake] Scanning dependencies of target slowness weirdness.

[Michael Jackson]

Thought it might be interesting to throw some other numbers at this. Everything is running on OS X 10.6.8 32GB RAM/SSD Boot Volume:

7200RPM Drive using Paragon Systems NTFS Version 10
43.4 secs NTFS
7200RPM Drive using Native OS X HFS+ drivers.
12.6 secs HFS+

Both of the above are on the physically same hard drive, but 2 different partitions.

10.4 secs HFS+ SSD (OWC 3G Mercury - 2010 Vintage) 
9.9 secs HFS+  SSD (Corsair Force 3 - 2012 Vintage)

Both the above were HFS+ Journaled on a 3G connection (although the Corsair is 6G capable)

The times were to configure one of my projects (dream3D.bluequartz.net)

Paragon says they are the fastest NTFS on OS X implementation.

Just adding some points to the conversation.
--
Mike Jackson <www.bluequartz.net>

On Sep 10, 2012, at 12:39 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote:

> On 9/10/2012 12:12 PM, Yuri Timenkov wrote:
>> Or it's implementation on Linux... I doubt anybody had any problems with
>> NTFS on Windows :)
> 
> No, NTFS sucks on any OS.  It is way slower with file stats and file access.
> 
> -Bill
> 
> --
> 
> Powered by www.kitware.com
> 
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
> 
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
> 
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake