[CMake] Source file symlinks on out-of-source builds

[Michael Jackson]

True, but I can always change the "build" to something else if needed  
(like a release). 98% of the time using "Build" works just fine. I  
think there have been lots of great discussions and suggestions in  
this thread that you should be able to find something that works for  
you.

I envy the distributed GCC folks who do -j50. ;-)

--
Mike Jackson <www.bluequartz.net>

PS: Had to use an old single CPU PPC the other day.. Painful going  
from a Dual Xeon 5500 to a 1.25GHz ppc..

On Dec 3, 2009, at 3:46 PM, Rodolfo Schulz de Lima wrote:

> Michael Jackson wrote:
>> cmake -C ${workspace_loc}/${project_name}/Build -j 16 VERBOSE=1
>>
>> And the executables (as setup in the Cmake files) are always built  
>> into
>> Build/Bin.
>
> This way you can only have one build tree per project. One way to  
> extend
> it is to use something like "Build_${build_type}" and set up variables
> accordingly. But, IMHO, symlink trees are simpler to work with.
>
> []s.
> rod
>
> PS: I envy your -j16 :)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>
> Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
>
> Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake