[CMake] CMake with Lua Experiment

[George Neill]

Brandon,

On 11/28/07, Brandon Van Every <bvanevery at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> - better scoping

- higher quality, outsourced documentation

- outsource core language bugs
> - popularity boost for 5 years

- some advanced programming constructs gained


I certainly can't debate those (unless CMake developers make significant
changes to the core LUA libraries).

Is backward compatibility with the current language a goal of the LUA
experiment?  I ask because the examples spoken of on this list appear to be
trying to mimic the current CMake syntax.

Thanks,
George.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/cmake/attachments/20071128/3de2bb53/attachment-0001.htm