[CMake] CMake test suite - 51% failure rate?! (x86/Solaris 10)
Matthew Woehlke
mw_triad at users.sourceforge.net
Mon Mar 26 14:33:14 EST 2007
A while back I "successfully"* built CMake on an x86/Solaris 10 box.
Now, trying to build on a different box, I am getting a 51% failure rate
in the test suite. Huh?!
(* the test suite has an odd problem with GNU make 3.81, otherwise it
was clean)
I also can't seem to find any output from the failed tests, which were:
15 - CommandLineTest (Failed)
16 - TarTest (Failed)
19 - CustComDepend (Failed)
20 - CustomCommand (Failed)
22 - FindPackageTest (Failed)
23 - SystemInformation (Failed)
24 - StringFileTest (Failed)
25 - MathTest (Failed)
27 - simple (Failed)
28 - OutOfSource (Failed)
29 - PreOrder (Failed)
31 - CxxOnly (Failed)
33 - SimpleInstall (Failed)
34 - SimpleInstall-Stage2 (Failed)
36 - LoadedCommand (Failed)
37 - LoadedCommandOneConfig (Failed)
38 - complex (Failed)
39 - complexOneConfig (Failed)
40 - Example (Failed)
41 - TutorialStep1 (Failed)
42 - TutorialStep2 (Failed)
43 - TutorialStep3 (Failed)
44 - TutorialStep4 (Failed)
45 - TutorialStep5 (Failed)
46 - testing (Failed)
47 - wrapping (Failed)
48 - testdriver1 (Failed)
49 - testdriver2 (Failed)
50 - testdriver3 (Failed)
56 - JumpWithLibOut (Failed)
57 - JumpNoLibOut (Failed)
61 - ExternalOBJ (Failed)
62 - kwsys (Failed)
63 - SubDir (Failed)
Ideas? The most obvious difference I can think of is that a different
compiler is being used in this case ("Sun C 5.8 2005/10/13", also there
is a(n ancient!) gcc 2.95.3 available) versus the box where CMake tested
OK ("Sun C 5.7 2005/01/07", no gcc available).
--
Matthew
"Stop that, it's silly!" -- Colonel
(Monty Python, "And Now For Something Completely Different")
More information about the CMake
mailing list