[CMake] [PATCH] kdevelop3 generator, 2nd version

[Andy Cedilnik]

Hi Alex,

On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 17:18, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> Yes. I just installed kdevelop 3.1.1 (the announcement was about 5 
> minutes old when I downloaded it) and compiled it, still the same 
> behaviour. 

This is weird. I have whatever came with Debian and it works fine. Look
at the wiki.

> > I suppose this means we may have to go back to polluting the source  
> > tree. 
> > One other option, since kdevelop only works on unix, would be to 
> > create a mirror tree with symlinks from the binary tree into the 
> > source tree for out of source builds. 
>  
> You mean a symlink for each and every source file ? 
> Hmm, not really a nice "solution"... 

We could have a symlink of the whole source tree. So there would be
symlink src pointing to /.../wherever/your/source/is
  
> > How does one do an out of source build with kdevlop right now? 
> > I am guessing you can't.  Perhaps we should be lobbing the kdevlop  
> > folks to add the feature of having a separate source tree from the  
> > build tree, and having the project files live in the build tree. 
>  
> Yes. But this will take some time. Probably it will mean I have to send a 
> patch. 
> For the meantime it would be nice if the project files would be created 
> as in my patch: the filelist file in the source dir, the project names 
> built out of the project name and the subdirectory. 
> Works well for me with a quite sophisticated cmake setup (the ecos stuff 
> I posted some weeks ago). 

The original patch produced lots of warnings on simple project like
CMake itself. You required PROJECT command in every directory if I
understand. Also, you require sources in the subdirectory of sources,
which means you cannot generate sources in the binary tree.

I will see how responsive KDevelop people are.

			Andy