<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">I've openned new issue for further
      discussion:<br>
      * <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://github.com/ruslo/CMake/issues/3">https://github.com/ruslo/CMake/issues/3</a><br>
      <br>
      On 18-Mar-16 06:24, Tamás Kenéz wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAPB8=n9d7oRv8V-U=m_=9PA0SPbqXAFHHuQz6AtR3CcHyjFWBA@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">Ruslo, I think we all could argue both against and
        for implementing cmake-ini files inside the cmake command. I
        mean I'm also aware of all the pros and cons. It's just that we
        weigh differently.
        <div>I like loosely connected simpler building blocks and my own
          cmake-wrapping extension script works fine, that's why I
          thought you would not lose anything with that.</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div><span style="font-size:12.8px">>> git commit
            --author="John Doe" --email=</span><a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:john.doe@example.com" target="_blank"
            style="font-size:12.8px">"john.doe@example.com"</a><span
            style="font-size:12.8px"> --branch="master"</span><br
            style="font-size:12.8px">
          <span style="font-size:12.8px">>> git push
            --remote="git://</span><a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="http://awesome.example.com/" target="_blank"
            style="font-size:12.8px">awesome.example.com</a><span
            style="font-size:12.8px">"</span><br
            style="font-size:12.8px">
          > <span style="font-size:12.8px">This is a complete
            nonsense!</span><br>
        </div>
        <div><span style="font-size:12.8px"><br>
          </span></div>
        <div><span style="font-size:12.8px">I agree and that's why I
            think cmake ini files is a good idea.</span></div>
        <div><span style="font-size:12.8px"><br>
          </span></div>
        <div><span style="font-size:12.8px">Tamas</span></div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 3:25 AM, Ruslan
          Baratov <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:ruslan_baratov@yahoo.com" target="_blank">ruslan_baratov@yahoo.com</a>></span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
              <div>On 15-Mar-16 02:42, Tamás Kenéz wrote:<br>
              </div>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <div dir="ltr">
                  <div>I also doubt this belongs to upstream. But you
                    could write a single, generic script which forwards
                    its arguments to cmake and also accepts and
                    processes the additional parameters along the way. I
                    don't think we'd lose anything:<br>
                  </div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>    cmakeini -c ipad -H.
                    -DTHIS_WILL_BE_FORWARDED=AS_IT_IS</div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>This is the approach I took as I needed features
                    like you described. But if there would be a mature,
                    versatile, community-tested script I'd be willing to
                    use it and contribute to it.<br>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </blockquote>
              As you can see I'm already using script `build.py` and
              there is not enough power for now (even if it extends
              CMake basic functionality a lot) so I was thinking to
              introduce global/local ini-configuration file anyway. Then
              I realize that most of the `build.py` functions can be
              implemented in such ini-configuration. So why not use
              CMake? Why for example not extend CMake GUI with this
              feature support? Why do users need to install some extra
              tools instead of just one?<br>
              <br>
              Global/local configuration files in not something special.
              Git for example has same system, yes it increase
              complexity but literally every user store setting there.<br>
              Just imagine you have to write something like this every
              commit + push:<br>
              <br>
              > git commit --author="John Doe" --email=<a
                moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:john.doe@example.com" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:john.doe@example.com">"john.doe@example.com"</a></a>
              --branch="master"<br>
              > git push --remote="git://<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="http://awesome.example.com" target="_blank">awesome.example.com</a>"<br>
              <br>
              This is a complete nonsense!<br>
              <br>
              So I'm planning to make a fork anyway and do some
              experiments even if it will not accepted to upstream.<br>
              <br>
              Ruslo<br>
              <br>
              <blockquote type="cite">
                <div dir="ltr">
                  <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
                  </div>
                  <div class="gmail_extra">Tamas</div>
                  <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
                    <div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at
                      4:22 PM, Ruslan Baratov via cmake-developers <span
                        dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                          href="mailto:cmake-developers@cmake.org"
                          target="_blank">cmake-developers@cmake.org</a>></span>
                      wrote:<br>
                      <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px
                        0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><span>On
                          14-Mar-16 21:59, Brad King wrote:<br>
                          <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
                            style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">On

                            03/12/2016 08:04 AM, Ruslan Baratov via
                            cmake-developers wrote:<br>
                            <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
                              style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">I
                              guess it is a well known fact that cmake
                              command is almost never<br>
                              executed alone and for non-trivial
                              examples usually hold some extra<br>
                              arguments (home directory, build
                              directory, verbosity level, toolchains,<br>
                              options, ...). Also I guess that such
                              commands doesn't change from<br>
                              day-to-day development process and an
                              obvious way to reduce typing is to<br>
                              create wrapper build scripts (.bat or .sh,
                              I personally use a Python one).<br>
                            </blockquote>
                            Sorry, I don't think something like this
                            belongs upstream.  It can easily<br>
                            be done with shell aliases or other custom
                            scripts.<br>
                          </blockquote>
                        </span> I've got quite opposite experience. It's
                        hard to say that family of custom scripts (+ a
                        lot of environment variables in .bashrc)  is an
                        "easy shell scripting", example:<br>
                        * <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://github.com/ruslo/polly/blob/162cd157d1d05261a7a708435197d883c4209005/bin/build.py"
                          rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/ruslo/polly/blob/162cd157d1d05261a7a708435197d883c4209005/bin/build.py</a><span><br>
                          <br>
                          <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
                            style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"> 
                             We shouldn't increase the complexity of the
                            CMake command line interface further.<br>
                          </blockquote>
                        </span> To be clear this feature required only
                        one new CMake option. The rest is responsibility
                        of some pre-build parsing module.<br>
                        <br>
                        In general I feel sad that CMake will not became
                        more user-friendly in this exact part. Though
                        the only proves of my point that can be provided
                        here is a users experience. Since I don't see
                        any feedback here I'm out of arguments...<br>
                        <br>
                        Ruslo
                        <div>
                          <div><br>
                            -- <br>
                            <br>
                            Powered by <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                              href="http://www.kitware.com"
                              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.kitware.com</a><br>
                            <br>
                            Please keep messages on-topic and check the
                            CMake FAQ at: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                              href="http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ"
                              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ</a><br>
                            <br>
                            Kitware offers various services to support
                            the CMake community. For more information on
                            each offering, please visit:<br>
                            <br>
                            CMake Support: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                              href="http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html"
                              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://cmake.org/cmake/help/support.html</a><br>
                            CMake Consulting: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html" rel="noreferrer"
                              target="_blank">http://cmake.org/cmake/help/consulting.html</a><br>
                            CMake Training Courses: <a
                              moz-do-not-send="true"
                              href="http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html"
                              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html">http://cmake.org/cmake/help/training.html</a></a><br>
                            <br>
                            Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
                            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                              href="http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html"
                              target="_blank">http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html</a><br>
                            <br>
                            Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:<br>
                            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                              href="http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers"
                              rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers</a><br>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                      </blockquote>
                    </div>
                    <br>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </blockquote>
              <br>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>