[cmake-developers] Future of ccmake and cmake-gui and internationalization

Eric Wing ewmailing at gmail.com
Thu Aug 17 12:11:23 EDT 2017


> If small and self-reliant are the criteria, how does FLTK
> (http://www.fltk.org/index.php) stack up?  For something like
> cmake-gui it would probably work just fine, and AFAIK it doesn't
> require GTK...  it uses LGPLv2 with a static linking exception, so
> it's probably as good/better than the current Qt requirement in that
> department.

Oddly, I don't have any direct experience with FLTK even though I've
known about it for years. The projects I get involved with usually
need a lot more native UI integration, so FLTK is never on the list.
And I personally prefer native UI experience.  But for something small
like the CMake GUI, it wouldn't bother me as much. That said, it
sounds like this is not a rewrite, so I guess the conversation is
moot.

Thanks,
Eric


More information about the cmake-developers mailing list