[cmake-developers] Roadmap to CMake 3.0

Rolf Eike Beer eike at sf-mail.de
Fri Oct 11 15:34:48 EDT 2013


Brad King wrote:

> * New policies to disable old commands that require significant
>   amounts of C++ code to be kept around just to support them.
>   These include (but may not be limited to):
> 
>   - exec_program: replaced by execute_process
>   - export_library_dependencies: replaced by export()/install(EXPORT)
>   - load_command: replaced by macros and functions; does not work
>     when the toolchain does not match the CMake binary anyway
>   - output_required_files: obscure

Can we do something against link_directories, please? This is a common pitfall 
for everyone coming from plain Makefiles and probably other people, too.

Just out of curiosity: is the Lua integration affecting the set of supported 
compilers?

Eike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/cmake-developers/attachments/20131011/20df6bfd/attachment.sig>


More information about the cmake-developers mailing list