[cmake-developers] Fixing ProcessorCount.cmake

[David Cole]

Hi Rolf,

Can you update to a CMake based on 'next' and try the commit I made this
morning on a QNX machine? (based on your patch, thank you for that...)

http://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=680ca4baab85cbc1be98bcfd81b7e4402ffa8d84

We are supposed to have a continuous and a nightly QNX dashboard running,
but they do not seem to be reporting for the last few days.


Thanks,
David


On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 4:52 PM, David Cole <david.cole at kitware.com> wrote:

> I will keep going with this on Monday....
>
> It was my intent to make the test fail last night on platforms where
> we could not determine the processor count, so we'd get a good sense
> of how much work remains for the platforms not yet accounted for. But
> I messed up the test a bit.
>
> I'll correct that, and apply this patch on Monday and we'll keep
> moving forward. Hopefully other folks can chime in after that if there
> are still more platforms where we need to use other techniques to come
> up with the result.
>
> Thanks for the patch!
>
>
> More next week,
> David
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 6:38 AM, Rolf Eike Beer <eike at sf-mail.de> wrote:
> > I feel like I'm taking the position the great Greg KH has in Linux kernel
> > development: the maintainer of crap. You write it "QNX" but you speak it
> > "crap". Don't get me wrong, I hate this stuff. But I have to deal with it
> so I
> > want CMake work there properly to reduce my pain.
> >
> > So here is a fix for the ProcessorCount.cmake module to work properly
> there.
> > This also makes it possible on all platforms that have getconf to detect
> if
> > _NPROCESSORS_ONLN is not supported.
> >
> > I would love to see if someone of Kitware could get into contact with the
> guys
> > at QNX. AFAIK there is sort of a free partner program where you get
> developer
> > licenses of their OS. I have two virtual machines (Linux KVM) running
> with
> > 6.4.1 and 6.5.0 which works (for some values of works). If you would go
> and
> > throw something like 6.3.2, 6.4.1, and 6.5.0 in virtual machines you
> could
> > make them build cmake nightly and test all this stuff. Sadly I can't use
> my
> > work machines for that (for different reasons).
> >
> > Eike
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cmake-developers mailing list
> > cmake-developers at cmake.org
> > http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cmake-developers
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/cmake-developers/attachments/20101108/eb304b93/attachment.html>